In a state near bankrupt, bigger and riskier options are being entertained. John Hodgman proposed solutions to the California budget crisis last week in a new segment called “You’re Welcome.”
Is the answer for California Marijuana and the Church of Scientology?
June 15, 2009
Leave a Comment » |
California Governor Race 2010, California Politics, News, Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged: Politics, US Politics |
Permalink
Posted by jackson
Does California Need a One-term Governor?
June 13, 2009As I sat down to write today I glanced over the litany of trials and tribulations facing the Golden State and thought back on a scene from the 1984 hit comedy Ghostbusters, in which the ghoul-fighting boys in gray are meeting with the mayor of New York to discuss the paranormal threats tearing the city apart:
Dr. Peter Venkman: This city is headed for a disaster of biblical proportions. Mayor: What do you mean, “biblical”? Dr Ray Stantz: What he means is Old Testament, Mr. Mayor, real wrath of God type stuff. Dr. Peter Venkman: Exactly. Dr Ray Stantz: Fire and brimstone coming down from the skies! Rivers and seas boiling! Dr. Egon Spengler: Forty years of darkness! Earthquakes, volcanoes… Winston Zeddemore: The dead rising from the grave! Dr. Peter Venkman: Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together… mass hysteria!
California, like NYC in the film, has ominous clouds looming on the horizon, granted of a much less supernatural origin, but some state officials seem one Stay Puft Marshmallow Man away from a full-scale panic, with the cohabitation of dogs and cats being replaced with the legal marriage of Jim’s and John’s. Disaster of epic, if not biblical, proportion is possible.
Leave a Comment » |
California Governor Race 2010, California Politics, Democrats, Election, News, Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged: Antonio Villaraigosa, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Budget Crisis, California Budget Crisis, California Governor Race 2010, California Politics, Democratic Party, Diane Feinstein, Exit the King, Gavin Newsom, Ghostbusters, Jerry Brown |
Permalink
Posted by jackson
Beauty and the Bill
October 25, 2008There has been much ado about Governor Palin’s $150,000 shopping spree. Is it much ado about nothing? That depends on what the meaning of ‘nothing’ is.
On the surface, it should not matter. I opened my statement for my 401K the other day – it has dropped 14% over recent weeks. I listened to economist Arthur Laffer tell Bill Maher’s audience last night that the stock market is a predictor for the economy and we potentially have two more years of economic slow down. We are still in Iraq. We are still in Afghanistan. Our enemy may be in Pakistan. Surely there are far more pressing concerns than Palin’s exorbitant shopping spree?
It does not really matter, but it is relevant. It is relevant for the same reason that Joe the Plumber became relevant. John McCain has made it relevant.
McCain chose Palin largely on what he felt she represented: a reformer with a maverick streak for standing up to wasteful government. That was the narrative he wanted to tell. With a straight face he managed to make glancing statements of confirmation that her experience as a small town mayor and small state governor qualified her for what might become the highest seat in our government. What he really wanted to talk about though was the narrative, her story.
Here was a small town girl with small town values. She did not attend any of the fancy east coast elitist colleges, although she did try her hand at five different schools. She was a self-proclaimed hockey mom, another appellation in the endless iterations of what might label ‘normal’ Americans. He has often said she is not part of the Georgetown cocktail set. She hunts wolves from helicopters, not sip drinks in the affluent suburbs of our capital. She has a large family and was to represent the average American.
In essence, what McCain needed her to be was a story. Governor Palin was hired to play a symbol – to be the arm candy of the GOP. She was to be Betty Draper to John McCain’s Don, a wholesome image of the girl next door who makes her man seem all the more real, all the more virile and all the more right American guy for the right American job.
So, does it matter that she managed to drop $75,062.63 in one stop at Neiman Marcus? Politically, I still say it is irrelevant but when you have been selling a candidate based on the narrative of her being the average American woman who is just like you and then she spends more than most plumbers will earn in a year during one stop at the epitome of high-priced luxury department stores, the narrative doesn’t flow.
If her shopping had been limited to just $75,000 eyebrows would have been raised, but she doubled that amount with stops at places such as Saks Fifth Avenue, Bloomingdale’s, Barneys and Lord and Taylor. She is not pushing her cart through WalMart. She is J-Lo shopping with a six-figure credit line footed by donors to the RNC.
Image is important in politics these days – too important. I write this post on the anniversary of the death of Paul Wellstone, Senator from Minnesota, who cared about policy and people but not clothes and image. We need more people like him. However, I understand the need for wardrobe and make-up for all candidates on the national stage and I sympathize that women such as Hillary Clinton have to face ridiculous questions and comments about pant suits and outfits. It is an absurd man’s world when you are running for President of the US.
How many hockey moms, soccer moms, WalMart moms could afford to spend $75,000 at Neiman Marcus? How many of them even live near a Neiman Marcus, the pantheon of all that is over priced? According to the US Department of Labor, the average American, whom Palin is supposed to represent, spent $1,874 on clothing in 2006. Palin spent more than 40 times what your WalMart mom spent on clothes in 2006 – in one stop. She spent a total of 80 times what your average soccer mom did. 80 Times.
Considering I had taken some time off from blogging recently, I had no intention whatsoever to return to write a post about Palin’s shopping, but when I read Ruben Navarette’s commentary yesterday something bothered me. Here is an excerpt of what he had to say about what he felt were unfair attacks on Governor Palin:
Many Americans don’t see why it’s a story. Fellow hockey mom Page Growney of New Canaan, Conn., asked The Associated Press, “What did you want to see her in, a turtleneck from L.L. Bean?”
Still, we’re told, this tempest in a Gucci bag has some Republicans worrying that shopping sprees at Neiman Marcus and Saks Fifth Avenue might undermine Palin’s everywoman image. To think, just last month, the criticism was that Sarah the Moose Hunter wasn’t sufficiently sophisticated or glamorous. Now her wardrobe signals the hockey mom is high-maintenance.
I agree that it is confusing as to why it is a story, unless we note that Palin’s candidacy has been more narrative than achievement, more style than substance. Palin is supposed to be the woman for all seasons. She has been going around to what she calls the pockets of “real America” and preaching to the party faithful. She has been stirring up the patriotic zealots in these small towns by telling the crowd that Obama does not represent their values.
In the quote above, Ms. Growney asks if we want to see Palin in an L.L. Bean turtleneck. My question to Ms. Growney is what does she wear? (I am fighting the temptation to ask you what you are wearing right now Ms. Growney) Does Ms. Growney spend $75,000 at Neiman Marcus?
I read another angry comment from a reader the other day, and forgive me because I cannot remember where I found it, asking how much Michelle Obama spends on clothes. Wasn’t the idea supposed to be that the Palin’s and McCain’s are very different from the Obama’s. Wasn’t the narrative that Palin was a regular gal and the Obama’s were elitists with questionable pasts? Saying Palin isn’t doing anything different from Michelle seems to be undermining the entire Palin experiment.
If you’re telling me that Palin is one of the common people and that is why we need her in office, then why does she need the expensive clothes? It just doesn’t mesh.
The really troublesome part of Navarette’s commentary is when he wants to dumb the issue down to liberals criticizing Palin’s lack of sophistication. We have never had reason to question her sophistication or her glamor. We have had just and rightful cause as voters to question her resume and qualifications. When she has mostly shied away from the press and served as a symbol to incite her party’s base, then we have cause to question that symbolism. When her value becomes more narrative than achievement, we are left to question that narrative.
It is a mess of your own making, John McCain. You wanted to turn her into the great American story and now voters have some questions about the plot.
If we back up for a moment we can see that this is tied to McCain’s attempt to divide the country during this election. The GOP has tried to create an Us vs Them scenario in which McCain and Palin are draped in red, white and blue, starting each day by saying the pledge of allegiance and then continuing on in their daily Norman Rockwell pursuits. Meanwhile, the Obama’s start each day with a fist pound and set off on their own nefarious agendas.
This is the reason we are talking about Joe the Plumber.
This is the reason for Sarah Palin.
This is why I spent the last 30 minutes writing about Neiman Marcus and pantsuits rather than the current state of affairs. Then again, perhaps these are the state of affairs.
Oh John McCain, you’ve come a long way baby, and you have dragged us all along with you.
1 Comment |
Barack Obama, Democrats, Election, Hillary Clinton, John McCain, News, Politics, Presidential Race, Republican, Uncategorized | Tagged: 000, 2008 Presidential Race, American Politics, Arthur Laffer, Average American, Barack Obama, Betty Draper, Bill Maher, Campaign Finance, Democrat, Don Draper, Election, Election 2008, gender, gop, Governor Palin, Hillary Clinton, hockey mom, Joe the Plumber, John McCain, Mad Men, McCain 2008, Michelle Obama, Neiman Marcus, News, Obama, Obama Biden 2008, Palin, Palin Spends $150, Palin's Clothes, Palin's Shopping, Palin's Wardrobe, Paul Wellstone, Politics, Presidential Race, Real America, Real Time with Bill Maher, Republican, RNC, Ruben Navarette, Saks Fifth Avenue, Sarah Palin, Sexism, Small Town America, Soccer Mom, Vice President, WalMart Mom |
Permalink
Posted by jackson
McCain’s Angry Mob
October 10, 2008Mental wounds still screaming
Driving me insane
I’m going off the rails on a crazy train
- Ozzy Osbourne, Crazy Train
It appears what once was dubbed ‘The Straight Talk Express’ has turned into the Crazy Train. Recent campaign stops for the McCain/Palin Anger Management Tour have turned into vitriolic screamfests of unadulterated hatred.
This is our politics? This is the vision of a candidate who says he wants to make things better?
The Washington Post, I know – gasp – The Main Stream Media, has an article today about the excessive emotion permeating McCain’s recent stops.
There were shouts of “Nobama” and “Socialist” at the mention of the Democratic presidential nominee. There were boos, middle fingers turned up and thumbs turned down…
McCain and his mad, mad mob are disillusioned that his candidacy and platform are less than desirable during our current economic chaos, but instead of refining their ideas and presenting a better plan to America, the McCain/Palin Anger Management Tour decided that flimsy attacks and character assassination will be the modus operandi. It is weak. It is pedestrian. It is predictable. When you are John McCain and you find yourself losing with nothing left to offer then you charge into empty attacks. It is the political equivalent of ‘Sweep the leg.’
A man, during this rally, went to the microphone and referred to Speaker Pelosi and the Democrats as ‘hooligans,’ launching into a rant, refusing to be interrupted even by Ol’ Mad McCain himself. At the end of his wide-eyed frothing, his chest still heaving with venom, he put down the microphone to which the rage-filled masses began one of their chants:
U-S-A! U-S-A!
The crowd seems to be feeding on pure emotion. Who are these people and why are they so driven by their baser and less civil instincts?
I’ve listened to preachers
I’ve listened to fools
I’ve watched all the dropouts
Who make their own rules
McCain, in typical grinfuck fashion, decides against settling the crowd into more reasonable composure but rather fans the bloodthirsty flames of their hysteria:
“Senator Obama has a clear radical, far-left, pro-abortion record,” McCain said after being asked about the issue. “
Of course, all Democrats are baby killers. It’s what we do. ‘Pro-Abortion’ – is that how inane our political debate has become? Wouldn’t you like to address the issues, Senator McCain?
He does, for a brief moment, pause his verbal assault on Obama to attempt to speak to a matter of actual importance – the economy and the recent bail out of banks and investment firms. (By the way Senator McCain, I refuse to buy into your PR machinations of terming it a ‘rescue.’ It was simply a bail out of financial institutions who caved into their greed and took advantage of flimsy regulations and loose credit, handing out more money than could be considered reasonable, over leveraging themselves with debt at times a 100:1 debit to equity ratio and naively thinking the housing market would never depreciate. They filled their pockets, the market sank and now I am a tax payer bailing their ass out. Call it what it is and stop the non-straight talk.)
Back to my point, McCain makes a gesture towards actual political dialog but stops short:
“The same people that are now claiming credit for this rescue are the same ones that were willing co-conspirators in causing this problem that it is,” he said, raising his voice to be heard over the crowd. “You know their names. You will know more of their names.”
Here are two names for you Senator, George Bush and John McCain. Your embrace of a unregulated free-market has led us into this mess. You don’t have to go far to point your finger – merely turn it on yourself.
Heirs of a cold war
That’s what we’ve become
Inheriting troubles I’m mentally numb
Crazy, I just cannot bear
I’m living with something that just isn’t fair
When he later mentions working together with Democrats to solve this problem, the crowd went silent. Republicans…working with Democrats?!? In the immortal words of Dr. Peter Venkman:
Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together… mass hysteria!
A man who has repeated throughout this campaign his ability and history of ‘reaching across the aisle’ is burning that bridge in full view of the public. His last gasp at his beloved Presidency is an angry, bombastic thrust of contempt. His Gollum-esque pursuit of Chief Executive has wrecked his reputation of being above the fray, of being a maverick.
Where have you gone John McCain, merely to madness? Did your years of wandering since having your candidacy destroyed by George Bush leave you with no grasp of the man you used to be? These rallies are escalating into angry riots – do you and your bride of Palinstein realize the monster you are creating? Do you understand the hate you are allowing, even encouraging, to fester?
Your feeble debate performances are only exacerbated by the bubbling contempt with which you hold your opponent. I am waiting for your ‘You can’t handle the truth’ moment when you lunge at Obama onstage. The people at your rallies are following your lead into blind anger.
Your antics reek of desperation. Your erratic decisions on what to do next belie a politician already beaten and out of ideas. You are in the final throes. One can only hope that America stays focused on real solutions and real political discourse and continues to ignore you and your minions’ bile-spewing rhetoric.
Take us home Oz:
Crazy, but that’s how it goes
Millions of people living as foes
Maybe its not to late
To learn how to love
And forget how to hate
Leave a Comment » |
Barack Obama, Democrats, Election, John McCain, News, Politics, Presidential Race, Republican, Uncategorized | Tagged: Angry Political Rallies, Angry Republicans, Angry Right, Barack Obama, Crazy Train, Democrat, Ghostbusters, John McCain, John McCain Anger, John McCain Angry, Karate Kid, Lord of the Rings, McCain, McCain Palin, McCain Palin Anger Management Tour, News, Obama, Ozzy Osbourne, Politics, Presidential Race, Republican, Sarah Palin, straight talk express |
Permalink
Posted by jackson
The Rise of Joe Six Pack
October 5, 2008This is the first of a three-part post.
For those who watched the vice-presidential debate this past Thursday, it was obvious that Governor Palin, with her idiomatic choices and circumlocutory answers, was making a concerted effort to bring the debate onto a turf which she understands and present herself to a segment of the population she believes understands her – Joe Sixpack:
You know what? It’s time that normal Joe Sixpack American is finally represented in the position of vice presidency,’ and I think that that’s kind of taken some people off guard, and they’re out of sorts, and they’re ticked off about it.
Governor Palin has given this moniker to the target audience for her ideas, replacing soccer moms and NASCAR dads but with venn diagram overlaps. JSP is meant to represent the average American and Palin has made the case that this average American should now be directly represented by the vice-president. Her appeal to this segment during the debate, mostly a relaxed conversational tone best suited for an Applebee’s commercial, was peppered with winks and smiles to drive home the feeling of next door neighbor familiarity, apparently crucial to JSP.
The strategy of crafting a general narrative around a large group of people is problematic for this election and I believe is a cultural crisis our nation is facing. These tactics are aimed at creating an Us vs Them dynamic. You live in either a red or a blue state. You are with us or you are with the terrorists. You either are an NRA card toting, beer swilling, unintelligent Republican or you are a latte-drinking, baby killing, elitist Democrat. We are witnessing the demise of our culture and our national intellect when we consent to being polarized into one of two juxtaposing camps. Moreover, the path to our house divided is paved with the oversimplification of ideas into facile absolutes predicated upon prejudice, stereotypes and lack of critical thought.
The fact that the dichotomy of American political opinion has become such an accepted notion is due to our own intellectual laziness. We no longer want to be challenged. Blogs and headlines provide mere talking points, with people choosing their news source by whatever fits best with their preconceived notions of how the world should work. It is a vicious cycle of self-confirmation, convincing each individual of the validity of their own ideas and labeling all other opinions as either naively misguided or disingenuously sophistic.
We are facing a political crisis in our country in which challenges, issues and threats are dumbed down into partisan rhetoric and thrown out to the biased masses for consumption. We are in danger of becoming a nation of non-thinkers.
This post has its genesis in an ongoing conversation I have been having with a conservative friend of mine who has become disillusioned with our national political dialog. Conservatives are portrayed as unintelligent and liberals as godless. This is the kind of intellectual laziness that I believe is threatening to become a regression of thought in general. My conversation with my conservative friend happens to coincide with my recent reading of Susan Jacoby’s The Age of American Unreason, which has provided valuable fodder for my assessment of our current political situation.
During Thursday’s VP debate Palin catered to the concept of Joe Sixpack, refusing to answer the questions the moderator asked. She wanted to speak directly to Joe Sixpack – the average American with average American values and a presumed aversion to those things now being labeled as elitist, i.e, latte or arugula, and hence liberal. McCain and Palin want to cast this race as Joe Sixpack versus the liberal.
Such a ploy can be effective, as we have seen before, but the United States is obviously more than just two types of people. I referred earlier to the political continuum and that concept is important in that it means there is a broad range of political thought with philosophies and individuals falling all along the curve. Our current political dilemma is the result of attacks crafted to present an opposing candidate in simple objectionable terms. The people and the issues must be turned into symbols so that they can then be undermined. The trend is fairly recent in our politics but it has permeated our culture at large and is defining entire parts of the nation.
Irving Kristol in Reflections of a Neoconservative said:
It is the self-imposed assignment of neoconservatism to explain to the American people why they are right, and to the intellectuals why they are wrong.
Kristol, the father of the neoconservative movement, neatly delineates Americans from intellectuals. The neoconservative movement must separate the two and make their case that the neoconservative idea is the American idea and anything else would fall under intellectual elitism, socialism, Marxism or some other equally pejorative ism.
Kristol’s book was written in 1983, but his movement was already beginning in the 1970’s as a counter revolution to the cultural happenings of the 1960’s. Politics has never been a game for the faint of heart but I believe a reasonable argument can be made for a new type of politics cast around the concept of narrative that was a big part of this movement. I recently read the memoirs of Gerald Ford, A Time to Heal. I walked away from that book wondering if Ford were perhaps the last true Republican who would hold the office of President of the United States. More importantly, Ford alluded to a changing of the guard within his own party when he ran against Ronald Reagan in the bitter Republican primary of 1976. He was distrustful of Reagan’s pandering to the right extremes of the Republican party, saw great folly in Reagan’s ideas, such as investing social security funds in the stock market or overzealous deregulation, and recognized the theatrics and narrative Reagan was thrusting into the Republican platform. Reagan was the Republican who would threaten to tear his own party in half and, in so doing, solidify a strong course to the right.
Under Reagan, the neoconservative movement crystallized and began to vilify all those who were not in agreement. In Kristol’s own words, we can see a transformation from a political conversation of viable alternatives to a rigid discussion of two points, right and wrong. I do not intend to lay responsibility for the stupefaction of American political discourse at the feet of Ronald Reagan, because I feel there has been a long history of political brinkmanship between the two political parties, but under the former Governor of California, the fault line gave way to an ever-widening political gap.
From this gap the narrative of aReagan conservative emerged. It would embody all that Reagan attempted to represent himself: traditional values, common sense, a cowboy and America first. The narrative usurped concepts of patriotism and moral integrity and denied any non-conservative access. Visual representations and symbolism had become increasingly important in presidential politics, as is often cited in the televised debate between Kennedy and Nixon, but under Reagan these images were given the full back story. He became America and those in his party, other than Ford of course, wanted to emulate him. Even now, his name is evoked endlessly by Republican candidates, as if they were calling upon Hercules or Achilles.
Reagan was given the benefit of having an arch-nemesis, the USSR. He would call upon theatrics throughout his presidency, “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall,” and use them to further both his cause and his image. Reagan was the Marlboro Man of American politics and a group of people, who would find multiple names as pundits addressed their importance in each election, would hold dear: John Wayne, Jesus and Ronald Reagan – not necessarily in that order.
It was here, in these years between 1976 and 1980, that Joe Sixpack would spring forth from Reagan’s forehead and come to dominate a political movement. It was here that the political continuum in the United States began to sever. It was here that our concepts first began to simplify and our language of politics began failing us.
In the next installment I will address the coming to power of Joe Sixpack and the counter movement from the left which set the stage for even further simplification and a messiness of linguistics and thought that led to a dangerous impasse, but I have been writing all morning and the ocean is calling. Since I only do this for fun – I will wrap for now.
Leave a Comment » |
Barack Obama, Democrats, Election, John McCain, News, Politics, Presidential Race, Republican, Uncategorized | Tagged: 2008 Presidential Race, Barack Obama, Blue Collar, Blue State, Conservative, Conservative versus Liberal, debate, Democrat, Election, Election 2008, Gerald Ford, Governor Palin, Irving Kristol, Jesus, Joe Biden, Joe Sixpack, John Wayne, Latte Liberals, Left Politics, Liberal, McCain Palin 2008, NASCAR Dad, Neoconservatism, Neoconservative Movement, News, Obama Biden 2008, Opinion, Palin Biden Debate, Political Continuum, Political Debate, Politics, Red State, Republican, Richard Nixon, Right Politics, Right Wing Conservatives, Right Wing Republican, Ronald Reagan, Sarah Palin, Soccer Mom, Vice Presidential Debate |
Permalink
Posted by jackson
The Republican National Convention Makes Me Glad I Am a Liberal
September 3, 2008I told myself I would be objective. I would tune into the RNC and listen to the speeches and attempt to identify with and understand where they were coming from. I wanted to keep an open mind.
I listened to Rudy. I listened to Sarah. I listened to the hooting and hollering of the masses in St Paul. I sat patiently as they went through their standard Political Attacks 101 manual and accused Obama and Democrats of being elitists, of being indecisive, of lacking patriotism and being soft on terrorism. Let’s see, they got in their rah-rah, their mindless USA chants, their snarky comments about Obama’s Ivy League education and they made themselves feel better by being derisive of community organizers and the work they do. I watched all their attempts to make this election about Obama, as a personality not a candidate. As McCain’s campaign manager Rick Davis said:
“This election is not about issues,” said Davis. “This election is about a composite view of what people take away from these candidates.”
So they stayed away from issues, which they apparently struggle with, and settled for empty rhetoric and snide American bravado. I looked into the sea of almost all white and mostly old faces laughing like hyenas at Giuliani’s shtick and thought ‘ Man, am I glad I am a liberal.’
The arrogance and pride they take in their status quo ideas and the supercilious way they flaunt their misguided concept of values oozed from my television like the beloved crude for which they lustily chanted. Speaking of which, their chanting of everything from ‘Rudy’ to ‘zero’ would have been enough for me to turn my back on their embarrassingly jingoistic display. I am glad I am a liberal. So what does that mean?
They would like to tell you they know what it means – that there is a long list of ways I am not like the average American. They will go red in the face telling the crowd they own patriotism and values. Last night I saw them kowtowing to the fringe of their base, creating a paradigm of Us vs Them. Rudy and Palin would have you believe I sip my latte while pondering over the many things about which I cannot make a decision. The truth is I take my coffee black, my whiskey neat and my beer – Shiner Bock and cold.
They want you to believe I want to take away everyone’s guns and would disband the NRA. The truth is I first learned to shoot a gun when I was eight and would take my gun with me to my grandmother’s house so I could shoot it without having to worry about hitting one of the neighbors. I began hunting shortly thereafter and was a hell of a shot. I then discovered my dad’s bow and arrows in his closet and, once he taught me to shoot, saved my money to buy a deer target to practice on between seasons.
I don’t want your gun. I want you to be responsible with your gun and teach your children to be responsible. I see no reason for you or me to own an automatic weapon and I believe we should run background checks and have waiting periods for people who want to buy guns. We should be responsible on both a personal and a community level. Furthermore, I think the NRA has become the last bastion of rabid gun owners and would not consider joining even though I plan to teach my own children to shoot a gun one day. That being said, let them have their meetings and their Hestons.
They want you to believe I am soft on crime and would be soft on terror if I were ever elected into a public office that dealt with matters of security. The truth is that I have faith in our court systems and do believe it is better to let 100 guilty men go free than for one innocent man to go to prison. Justice should be the safeguard of the innocent. As for being soft on terror, I think we should diligently pursue those who have wrought terror on our country but we should do it in the places where they live, Afghanistan, and not the places we merely want to occupy, Iraq.
They would try and convince you that I favor a government who will take care of my every need and from which I can live off of endlessly. In truth, I put myself through college, pay my student loans regularly and have never been on unemployment in my life. I was raised by a proud single mother who worked herself nearly to death to raise two kids and never once did we rely on anyone but family. I believe people should be self-sustaining but I realize there are times that are beyond people’s control. I know that, though we were not rich and probably were on the lower end of middle-class, we were a white family living in Texas and that is a far better start than many others will receive. We should work together to give everyone a fair start and a means of achieving their dream.
They will make the argument that I am not patriotic because I don’t wrap myself in an American flag. Wrapping yourself in an American flag doesn’t make you a patriot – it makes you a Republican. I am proud of my country but part of that pride comes in the fact that I am allowed to hold it accountable. I vote and participate in local, state and federal elections and campaigns. I have spent time rebuilding houses after hurricanes and raising money for local causes. I look at my country at times and am disappointed, but I remember what my mother told me once when I misbehaved “I will always love you, but I won’t always like what you are doing.”
I would add to that thought that it is patriotic to hold my country and its leaders accountable.
They would label me as a tree-hugging, granola eating liberal and I would not argue with that very much. I surf, backpack, hike, mountain bike and enjoy the outdoors. I want my children one day to enjoy it just as much as me. We have to protect our natural resources and pass them on to our posterity, as pristine as possible. You tell me you want to drill in Alaska in order to lower the price you are paying at the pump and reduce our dependency on foreign oil. I first tell you to get up to speed on the process of finding, drilling and bringing oil to the market and then I tell you that the only way we will reduce our dependency on foreign oil is to reduce our dependency on oil period. There are alternatives we should aggressively pursue – hell, even Pickens has a pretty good idea of where to start.
They want you to believe liberals lack American values but I tell you that I am polite, say please and ma’am. I believe the 4th of July is an important holiday and sometimes get teary when listening to our national anthem. I respect your right to privacy and your right to do whatever you want to do with your life. I do believe we all hold a responsibility to one another and should use the golden rule in our daily lives. They want America to see liberals as elitists and out of step, but I have been to monster truck rallies, rodeos and NASCAR. I have seen George Strait, Garth Brooks, Kenny Rogers, Willie Nelson, Pat Green and David Allen Coe live in concert. I can run a trout line and have helped my grandpa make moonshine. They want you to think I am a liberal elitist and I think you should know just how white trash I am.
They want you to see two Americas but I only see one with all kinds of diversity and all kinds of people making their way. Strange that the party who relies so heavily on love of the USA is the one trying to cut it in half. We shouldn’t allow them to do so. We are a great body of individuals and cannot be cast as simply an Us or a Them. That is part of what makes America great.
Tonight, listening to their self-congratulatory tirades, I thought to myself ‘I am glad I am a liberal.’ To have all the myriad of American experiences but to take from those my own liberal leaning beliefs. It feels good to care about the environment. It feels good to love my country but hold her accountable. It feels good to try and walk in the shoes of my fellow Americans, to help when I can and do my part. It feels good to engage in the things I love but to be responsible and pass that responsibility on to others. It feels good to believe in justice and believe in our ability to achieve and maintain it.
Would a conservative be incapable of feeling exactly the same way? Absolutely not – but there are people who want you to believe that is the case. Now is not the time for a house divided.
Tonight I watched the party of Lincoln and listened to some of the zealots making their case and I just smiled. They’re just Americans with their own beliefs, like me.
“Damn it feels good to be a liberal.“
4 Comments |
Barack Obama, Democrats, Election, John McCain, Politics, Presidential Race, Republican, Uncategorized | Tagged: Barack Obama, Conservative, Convention, Convention Speeches, Democrat, Election, gop, Governor Sarah Palin, John McCain, John McCain for President, Liberal, McCain, News, NRA, Obama, Political, Politics, Republican, Republican Convention, Republican National Convention, RNC, Rudy Giuliani, Sarah Palin |
Permalink
Posted by jackson
Defending Sarah Palin
September 3, 2008I have been at a loss as to what to write regarding the Republican Convention and McCain’s pick of Sarah Palin as a running mate. His choice left me speechless – it was either a completely horrible pick or else I was unaware of its diabolical brilliance. After a few days of rumination I am going with the former.
I don’t want to launch into another critique of her validity as a candidate. There is plenty of that to go around. Palin is enduring a public vetting process in lieu of the one McCain has allegedly given her. The Washington Post today has an article today stating:
Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin was not subjected to a lengthy in-person background interview with the head of Sen. John McCain’s vice presidential vetting team until last Wednesday in Arizona, the day before McCain asked her to be his running mate, and she did not disclose the fact that her 17-year-old daughter was pregnant until that meeting, two knowledgeable McCain officials acknowledged Tuesday.
The article goes on to quote one of the officials as saying the last couple of weeks have been ‘frantic.’ She may have been on the list but the selection of Palin still seemed to surprise even those closest to McCain.
Rumors abound that McCain wanted to choose Joe Lieberman but that the conservative arm of his party let him know that Lieberman was unacceptable. Party First, I suppose. He appears to have settled on Palin and is now left defending his choice.
This is where things become disturbing.
McCain and his cronies argue that Palin is qualified – more qualified than Barack Obama or Joe Biden due to her executive level experience. Of course this makes her more qualified than John McCain as well. By this logic, she is the most qualified candidate in the mix.
Is anyone really buying this though, outside of the folks at the convention in Minnesota? With the PTA, mayoral and now 20 months in the gubernatorial position, she has 10 years of experience in elected office. Even Obama has 12 years – but, oh yes, his was not executive experience. The GOP faithful seem dumbfounded and offended when anyone begins to question her resume. How could someone possibly question her experience as mayor of Wasilla? If someone does point a critical eye at Palin’s qualifications, that person runs the risk of being labeled a sexist:
“I am appalled by the Obama campaign’s attempts to belittle Governor Sarah Palin’s experience,” Republican National Committee Victory Chair Carly Fiorina said a statement released Tuesday. “The facts are that Sarah Palin has made more executive decisions as a Mayor and Governor than Barack Obama has made in his life. Because of Hillary Clinton’s historic run for the Presidency and the treatment she received, American women are more highly tuned than ever to recognize and decry sexism in all its forms. They will not tolerate sexist treatment of Governor Palin.”
Just so I am entirely clear on this, McCain’s campaign has made experience a cornerstone of this campaign and have repeatedly called into question Obama’s experience. However, doing the same thing to Palin garners you the label of sexist. When McCain does the same thing to a black man, does that make him a racist? Palin’s resume and qualifications for the role are off the table because she is a woman.
Absurdity: a message whose content is at variance with reason
McCain made this a personal issue, going so far as to cancel a CNN interview due to the some of the critical questions the network asked about his pick. Here was the particular exchange in question which McCain found offensive:
In the interview, which aired Monday night, anchor Campbell Brown asked McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds repeatedly to cite “just one decision” Gov. Palin made as commander of the Alaska National Guard, a position Mr. Bounds highlighted as evidence of her governing experience. Mr. Bounds dodged the question, saying “Campbell, certainly you don’t mean to belittle every — every judgment that she makes” in that role.”
He did not answer the question, which has become the standard way of handling questions by McCain and minions. Campbell Brown asked a reasonable question: McCain has claimed Palin is Commander of the Alaska National Guard, please substantiate. Mr. Bounds refused. Let’s ignore the fact that the Alaska National Guard has said she plays,
“no role in national defense activities, even when they involve the Alaska National Guard. The entire operation is under federal control, and the governor is not briefed on situations.”
Actually, it has come out that much of the power McCain would like to attribute to Palin has been stripped by President Bush with a clause from National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007. When defending Palin, the trend has been to avoid questions by going on the attack. Here we see Bounds turning on Campbell Brown because he doesn’t have an answer to her question – a valid and important question since the GOP has cited this as part of her qualifications. I cannot even make ’straight talk’ jokes any more about McCain’s campaign because it is so far removed from any concept of straight talk – it has lost all resonance.
I had the same reaction this Sunday when I was watching Minnesota Governor Pawlenty on Meet the Press. Brokaw asked Pawlenty about the criticisms Palin received from her state paper:
Let’s share with our viewers and with you as well an editorial in the Fairbanks Alaska Daily News-Miner. “[Palin] has never publicly demonstrated the kind of interest, much less expertise, in federal issues and foreign affairs that should mark a candidate for the second-highest office in the land. Republicans rightfully have criticized the Democratic nominee, Senator Barack Obama, for his lack of experience, but Palin is a neophyte in comparison; how will Republicans reconcile the criticism of Obama with the obligatory cheering for Palin?
“Most people would acknowledge that, regardless of her charm and good intentions, Palin is not ready for the top job. McCain seems to have put his political interests ahead of the nation’s when he created the possibility that she might fill it. It’s clear that McCain picked Palin for reasons of image, not substance.”
This is a perfectly reasonable question. The Fairbanks Alaska Daily News, which has been covering Palin for her 20 months as governor, has said she is not ready. How do Republicans respond to that? Here is what Pawlenty said:
Well, in fairness to Governor Palin, let’s do the same analysis as to Senator Obama. He’s basically graduated from law school, went on to be a community organizer and a law professor, went to the U.S. Senate and began running for president, essentially, the day he arrived. So he didn’t even stick around in the Senate very long before he began running for governor. So what it is in his background, Tom, that would give him that same type of requisite wisdom and judgment and insight on national security matters or foreign affairs matter or anything else?
His answer was a non-answer. The GOP refuses to answer questions about Palin’s experience. Pawlenty did go on to talk about Palin’s ‘executive’ experience and her tenure as the Commander of the Alaska National Guard, but the GOP offers no specifics here and the facts don’t mesh with the story they’re telling.
Now Palin is in seclusion, tucked safely away from the press and their pesky questions.
The McCain campaign scrambled to take control of the public debate over vice-presidential pick Sarah Palin, canceling her public appearances and teaming her with high-powered Republican operatives as she prepared for a speech Wednesday night that will be her first…
No more questions will be answered at this time. John McCain will not do his scheduled interview because these questions have been inappropriate. Should we be worried when candidates refuse to answer reasonable questions?
Fred Thompson last night, trotted out the old and familiar ‘us versus them’ arguments in his defense of Palin:
Let’s be clear … the selection of Governor Palin has the other side and their friends in the media in a state of panic.
I would say the media is in a state of frenzy, not panic. It is a feeding frenzy, a circus in the making. Fred Thompson is playing to his base by trying to convince people the media is out to get them. Mad Ol’ McCain has put forward a candidate with a questionable record and then refuses to answer those questions. It is along the same lines as his perpetual POW defense of everything he does – Don’t answer the question just talk about being a POW. Now with Palin, it is – Don’t answer the question, accuse them of being sexist and unfair and then go on the attack.
Am I worried that Palin lacks qualificiations? Not so much. I do worry about a political campaign steeped in secrecy. I worry about candidates who refuse to answer questions. I worry about a party who has made truth and reason expendable.
I worry that this is indeed Bush III, with all the secrecy and indignation with being questioned. I worry that perhaps we have not learned anything during Bush/Cheney’s failed eight years. I worry that we just might be gullible enough to do it all over again.
Leave a Comment » |
Barack Obama, Election, John McCain, Politics, Presidential Race, Republican, Uncategorized | Tagged: 2008 Presidential Race, Alaska, Barack Obama, Campbell Brown, Election, Governor Palin, Governor Pawlenty, Governor Sarah Palin, Joe Lieberman, John McCain, McCain, McCain for President, McCain Palin, Meet the Press, News, Political, Politics, Sarah Palin, Tom Brokaw, Tucker Bounds, US Politics |
Permalink
Posted by jackson
McCain Met Palin Once Before Making her his Running Mate
August 29, 2008Waking up on the west coast means you’re always a few hours behind. In a world in which the news never stops, at least the reporting of it, the 7am alarm means today’s domestic news has been churning for 10 hours already.
I turn on the news this morning to see McCain wasted no time in bagging Obama’s thunder and announcing his new running mate, Sarah Palin. She has been the governor of Alaska for the last 20 months. McCain and Palin met for the first time in February during the National Governor’s Association in Washington. The next time the two spoke was on Sunday of this past week when McCain called to discuss the position of Vice-President of the United States with her. Then, Thursday morning – i.e. yesterday, McCain met her for the second time and offered her a chance to be our next Vice-President.
That’s six months with two conversations, one via phone. In my own pathetic world I look at that and think I would not feel comfortable taking her to a party, much less making her a partner. Granted, I am not nearly as important as the potential president of the United States – but isn’t that the @#$%ing point?!?
McCain does realize he is running for president, doesn’t he? Perhaps someone should tell him. He must also realize that a VP pick probably won’t make your ticket but it can drag it down, like a Quayle.
People familiar with the rigorous vetting procedure Obama had in place say that it was thoughtful and thorough. He wanted someone with whom he felt comfortable on both a personal and a professional level and he chose Biden, who can ably step into the role should something happen to President Obama.
McCain meets Palin at a conference, they chat for a few moments and then he decides to put her one malignant melanoma moment away from the most powerful position in the free world? Is that the kind of judgment we need?
This vaguely smacks of when George W. Bush nominated Harriet Miers for the Supreme Court. It was almost as if he looked about the room, pointed to Harriet and asked ‘What about her?’ Harriet was then ripped apart by the press, with her credentials and education being trampled by those finding them wanting.
Has McCain done the same thing? Was he sitting around one of his houses last week when he looked at Joe and said ‘What about that cute governor from Alaska?’
I am not going to launch into a critique of Sarah Palin here. I don’t know enough about her yet to make an informed decision.
Apparently neither does McCain.
3 Comments |
Barack Obama, Election, John McCain, News, Politics, Presidential Race, Republican, Uncategorized | Tagged: 2008 Presidential Race, Alaska, Barack Obama, Bush, Bush 3rd term, Election, George Bush, George W. Bush, Governor Palin, Governor Sarah Palin, Harriet Miers, Joe Biden, John McCain, John McCain Chooses Running Mate, McCain, McCain 2008, McCain Palin, McCain Palin 2008, McCain Running Mate, McCain spoke to Palin Once, McCain's Running Mate, News, Politics, Presidential Race, Republican, Vetting, Vice President, Vice President Selection |
Permalink
Posted by jackson
Sarah Palin is Anti-Choice
August 29, 2008When I was running a search this morning to learn a little more about John McCain’s new sidekick, I found a tasty nugget of pro-GOP exaggeration. Sarah Palin has been an unequivocal opponent of a woman’s right to choose – and right-wingers, still somewhat tepid in their support of McCain, have rejoiced at her nomination. Here’s the kind of endorsement you just can’t buy, pay special attention to the last line:
Governor Palin is a Protestant Evangelical Christian. Moreover, she is strongly ‘pro-life’, not like the à la carte Catholic Joe Biden who supports abortion. It will be difficult for any ‘pro-choice’ group to attack her on this, not least because she lives every day with the very real difficulties of bringing up a Down’s child – a child which the vast majority of pro-choicers would have denied the right to life.
We pro-choicers have tried to be subtle about it but Archbishop Cranmer nailed us. At the end of every local Democratic precinct meeting, we scheme up new ways to abort children with Down’s syndrome. Of course I am being silly here, we don’t limit it to just Down’s syndrome – we include children with an excess of baby fat and ones with oddly shaped heads.
There is small-minded vitriol slung from both sidelines but this kind of hyperbole would be offensive if it were not so ridiculous.
Leave a Comment » |
Democrats, Election, John McCain, Politics, Presidential Race, Republican, Uncategorized | Tagged: Anti-Choice, Election, Election 2008, Governor Palin, John McCain, McCain, McCain Palin, News, Presidential Race, Pro-Choice, pro-life, Republican, Sarah Palin |
Permalink
Posted by jackson
Obama’s Convention Speech
August 29, 2008Tonight Barack Obama set the bar high. He had a structured outline of what he needed to communicate to the American people and had calculated in what his opponents might offer in terms of a rebuttal. It was a brilliant first move. Rest assured, the battle for the White House began tonight.
Outside of my own self-adulation, I use the term ‘brilliant’ sparingly. Here is why I believe Obama’s speech was brilliant, sans hyperbole. He began and ended his speech deep within the patriotic confines of the very Constitution which bestows upon each of us explicit rights. How could a Republican, even a fork-tongued one such Rove, undermine the ideals of the foundation of our rights?
Here is what I mean. Obama talked early in his speech about American promise. This would equate to American pride or Rah-Rah USA in GOP-speak. He linked it, necessarily so, to the concept of individual responsibility. He has taken two core concepts from Republican thought, Jingoistic Flag Waving and Get the Government Out of My Face-ism, and presented them in a reasonable format entirely at ease with a liberal audience. He proclaimed that our country has a history of greatness and is something to be proud of but part of that pride comes from individuals doing their part for the greater good.
The Republican attack manual will require McCain, at some point next week, to accuse Obama of being another big government liberal. Obama used his speech tonight to acknowledge that he has some big ideas, even going so far as to say that:
America, now is not the time for small plans.
He did this but made certain it was within the context of personal responsibility:
Ours is a promise that says government cannot solve all our problems, but what it should do is that which we cannot do for ourselves.
He lays out that we should have the kinds of freedoms we consider essential, to make our own lives, to engage in a free and open market, but that there is an element of personal responsibility there that will be required of each of us. We are individuals but we ‘rise or fall as one nation.’
This clearly hearkens back to Kennedy asking us to ask ourselves what we can do for our country. We have a responsibility as a citizen to treat one another with respect, conduct business responsibly, to parent our own children and then our government, in turn, can focus on the things which are beyond our means.
As I was listening to him, the Preamble to the Constitution began running through my mind:
We the people of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America
These are the words of a young nation, ill at ease with a centralized form of government, agreeing to come together to do the things beyond the means of the individual: provide defense, insure justice, promote general welfare. Senator Obama is asking of us nothing more than our founding fathers asked – be an individual, be responsible and be comforted knowing the government will only step in to handle that which you cannot.
How do even the most rabid attack-yderms criticize a candidate for echoing the thoughts of Madison and the rest of the brave people who gave birth to our great nation? It was a stroke of brilliance – patriotism, individual accountability and government programs wrapped together in the pursuit of a more perfect union.
This was merely the backdrop though, a preemptive shot across the bow of all the Repub’s foaming at the mouth, desperately hoping to keep their powder dry. Obama, while demonstrating the tie between his ideas and those of our founders, also talked about righting our most recent history of failures, mostly those of Bush. Within the framework of discussing how we can work together to fulfill our promise, he described the way our government is broken.
Again, this anticipates a standard rebuttal from the GOP, accusing Obama of being big government, but he assuages those fears one might have of the government by saying the problems we have today are not necessarily the product of government, but rather of a government broken by the mismanagement of its principles by Republicans such as Bush, Cheney and McCain. He highlighted some of the successes of Clinton’s term and then contrasted them against the abysmal administration of George W. Bush. He even gets to reemphasize our American pride when he chides Bush and company by saying:
America, we are better than these last eight years.
He refuses to allow the idea of patriotism to be the sole domain of Republicans, as they would have us believe. This will be an important point towards the end of his speech.
Once he established that our current government is broken he wasted no time in pointing out that John McCain, though a good man and a war hero, has lined up with Bush to push through these broken policies over 90% of the time. McCain the man is to be respected but it is part of our individual duty to call into question his judgment and the decisions he has made. By straying from the Bush flock less than 10% of the time, McCain represents nothing in terms of a solution to our current troubles.
Obama then turned directly into the heart of darkness, the vaunted domain McCain claims as his own: National Security. Obama knows that if he has a weakness against John McCain it is national security. McCain has cut his chops throughout his career on the fact that he is a war hero. Obama turned the argument from McCain’s service in Vietnam to McCain’s judgment in more current affairs:
For while Sen. McCain was turning his sights to Iraq just days after 9/11, I stood up and opposed this war, knowing it would distract us from the real threats that we face.
By demonstrating that McCain’s service record will not be the ‘decider’ but we will have to rely on his judgment and that his judgment took us away from the real enemy and landed us in a quagmire called the Occupation of Iraq, Obama demonstrates that McCain’s security credentials are perhaps overrated. The real enemy is still at large and McCain, to the bloodthirsty cheers of the GOP faithful, extolled his willingness to follow bin Laden to the gates of Hell but Obama points out that bin Laden was actually in a cave and McCain chose to leave him there.
Obama tonight refused to give McCain a free pass on security credentials merely because McCain was a POW. His service is admirable but it will be his judgment upon which the safety of our country relies and that judgment has been lacking. Obama framed the national security debate in these terms:
That’s not the judgment we need. That won’t keep American safe. We need a president who can face the threats of the future, not keep grasping at the ideas of the past.
This also marked a shift into a subtle attack on John McCain. Obama began focusing on moving forward, on taking American promise into the future, and as he was doing so he cast McCain as a relic. McCain is a war hero, but those days are behind him and now he is just another Washington insider making bad decisions. By aligning McCain with Bush and the failed policies of the last eight years, when the discussion shifts to the future there is a stark contrast between what McCain represents, broken government, and what Obama represents, American promise.
Obama then returned to patriotism and, as I mentioned earlier, he states that ‘patriotism has no party.’ He framed the upcoming election in terms of civil debate and civil disagreement in which neither party should challenge the other’s character or patriotism. Obama insisted that:
We all put country first.
He again denies McCain one of the few tricks he has left, abject patriotism. Obama gave a moving talk about soldiers, regardless of party, fighting and bleeding together. They fight as Americans. We are all Americans. We all put our country first. By offering up this vision of unity he also sought to mitigate the polarizing topics of abortion, gun control and same sex marriage. All three of these will be targeted by the GOP but again Obama took the preemptive shot.
He conceded people do not agree on abortion but asked that surely we can all work together to reduce unwanted pregnancies. This is entirely reasonable. Then he pointed out that rural hunters may have a different view of guns from inner-city families but certainly we can all work to keep AK-47’s out of the hands of criminals. Who would argue with that? Lastly, he mentioned there are varying opinions on same sex marriage but we should all insist that this is no ground for discrimination. He took three very polarizing topics and gave people on each side a reasonable common ground.
He then went one step further and anticpated another attack. Obama clearly stated:
I know there are those who dismiss such beliefs as happy talk…And that’s to be expected. Because if you don’t have any fresh ideas, then you use stale tactics to scare voters.
Obama knows that people will say he is pie in the sky hopeful, but just because an idea is novel does not mean it will not work. We are to expect grave fear talk from the GOP starting tonight, I am sure.
Before coming back to his Constitutional beginning, Obama made a key point in his speech. He rejects the idea that this election is a referendum on Barack Obama but insists it is about the American people. It is all the people who worked for Obama and who worked for Clinton. It is about all the people who want a better life and can’t see it right now with the way things are working. It is about all the folks facing a dead end but believe there is something better. This election is not about one man or one idea but is about all of us working together.
And suddenly, there we are. He is ending his speech, focusing on the future and fulfilling the American promise first dreamed up by Washington, Adams, Jefferson and Madison and letting each of us know that we too have a part to play. We are part of that promise. We are a key to tomorrow. We have the ability, working together, to change our nation and then change the world and never have we seen that change so necessary as it is today.
It was never about him. It was certainly never about McCain. It is we the people of the United States of America – working together to form a more perfect union.
Brilliant.
God bless America.
8 Comments |
Barack Obama, Democratic Primary, Democrats, Election, Hillary Clinton, John McCain, News, Politics, Presidential Race, Republican, Uncategorized | Tagged: 2008 Democratic Convention, Barack Obama, Barack Obama's Speech, Constitution, Democratic National Convention, Democrats, Denver, Denver Convention, Election, Invesco, John McCain, McCain, News, Obama, Obama's Acceptance Speech, Obama's Convention Speech, Obama's Nomination Speech, Obama's Speech, Politics, Preamble, Republicans, Speech, US Politics |
Permalink
Posted by jackson




































